Two payment plans have dominated the Noida commercial market over the past few years: the 40:60 down-payment plan and the older 50:25:15:10 construction-linked plan. At CRC The Flagship, the current offer is the 40:60 plan — and it is a good moment to understand why that is the right structure now.
The 40:60 plan — simple and low-friction
The 40:60 plan is simple: 40 percent on booking, 60 percent on possession. It rewards buyers who can deploy capital early and who trust the developer's delivery timeline. With Towers 1, 2 and 3 construction already complete at The Flagship and only Tower 4 still under way, the delivery risk that the old construction-linked plans used to hedge is substantially reduced.
Worked example — ₹1.10 Cr retail unit
- Ticket
- ₹1.10 Cr
- On booking (40%)
- ₹44 L
- On possession (60%)
- ₹66 L
- Mid-cycle calls
- None
The 50:25:15:10 plan — a delivery-risk hedge
Historically, the 50:25:15:10 plan spread payments across four tranches aligned with construction milestones — 50 percent on booking, 25 percent during construction, 15 percent before possession, and the final 10 percent after possession. This construction-linked structure was effectively a delivery-risk hedge: you only paid as the campus rose. It suited new launches, where towers had not yet broken ground and buyers were — reasonably — unwilling to commit full capital against a hole in the ground.
The trade-off was always price. A 50:25:15:10 construction-linked plan ties the developer's cashflow to milestones the developer cannot always control — approvals, monsoon seasons, labour availability. Developers priced that uncertainty into the headline rate. In practice, 50:25:15:10 plans typically carried a 3–7% premium on the effective per-sqft rate versus an equivalent 40:60 plan on the same asset.
GST, registration and the financing layer
Neither plan exists in a vacuum — both interact with GST, stamp duty and loan structures in ways worth mapping before you sign. GST on commercial property purchase currently sits at 12% (or 5% without input tax credit, depending on structure), payable against each tranche as it falls due. A 40:60 plan concentrates GST into two large payments; a 50:25:15:10 spreads it. For leveraged buyers, bank loan disbursal schedules need to align with the plan — most Grade-A commercial lenders disburse 70% LTV against 40:60 schedules more cleanly than against mid-cycle construction-linked tranches.
A stress test — what happens if possession slips?
Possession dates slip. It is the single most-asked question at the sales office. Under a 40:60 plan, a three-month slip is financially neutral — your 60% is due on possession, whichever date that is. Under a 50:25:15:10 plan, the same slip affects your 15% pre-possession tranche timing, which may matter for personal cashflow planning but does not change the total cost. The real hedge against slippage is not the payment plan — it is buying at a stage where enough of the campus is already built that the remaining construction risk is bounded.
How the two compare
Cashflow
40:60 is two tranches. 50:25:15:10 is four tranches over multiple years.
Delivery risk
50:25:15:10 hedges delivery risk. 40:60 assumes the developer will deliver.
Net pricing
40:60 typically comes with a better effective rate — the developer values certainty of funds.
Right for
40:60 for near-ready projects with credible track record. 50:25:15:10 for new launches.
See the current 40:60 plan at The Flagship
Full pricing, unit-wise ticket sizes, and the guaranteed-lease schedule.

